Aircraft carrier Illustrious class

British carriers Illustrious, Formidable, Victorious, Indomitable

british-flagIllustrious class (4 ships: Illustrious, Formidable, Victorious, Indomitable).
Type: Aircraft carrier.

History:

HMS Illustrious

The class ship Illustrious early in her career.

The 1936 Programme provided for the construction of two carriers for the Royal Navy. The 23,000-ton limit set by the Second London Treaty was in force, and it seemed at first that the basic Ark Royal design could be taken, the extra 1,000 tons available being used to incorporate improvements. The spectre of a European war loomed large, however, and with it the realisation that the Royal Navy would be forced to operate under constant threat of land-based air attack, particularly in the Mediterranean – where Italy’s intentions had been unpredictable since the early 1930s – and in the North Sea.

A novel approach, guided by the strong representations of Rear-Admiral Henderson, the Third Sea Lord, was adopted to meet the threat: the carriers should be given an unprecedented measure of passive defence, in the form of extensive armouring, plus a heavy anti-aircraft battery, much as in Ark Royal. The primary task was to preserve the carrier’s main armament – her strike aircraft – and so the stowage area was designed as an armoured ‘box’ intended to be proof against 500lb bombs and 6in shells. As in Ark Royal, belt, bulkhead and armour deck protection for machinery and magazines was also to be incorporated.

The problem was one of accomplishing all this within the Treaty displacement limits; clearly, something had to be sacrificed, and the victim was the two-storied hangar arrangement of the earlier design. This would save not only weight in itself, but also top-weight, ensuring the stability of the hull, whose dimensions were more or less fixed for the same reasons as were Ark Royal’s (permitted by drydocking).

As finalised, the hangar was provided with 4 1/2in armoured sides, a 3in roof (forming part of the flight deck) and 4 1/2in bulkheads forward and aft, a 3in armoured deck acting as the hangar floor and extending to the 4 1/2in main belt which was itself closed by armoured bulkheads. Additional armour was included to protect the steering compartments (3in), the flight deck before and abaft the hangar limits (1 1/2in) and the hangar deck ends (1in). The dimensions of the hangar were 458ft x 62ft, with a height of 16ft, providing accommodation for thirty torpedo-bombers and six fighter/dive-bombers, a total capacity half that of Ark Royal’s originally specified complement.
The weak spots in an otherwise totally protected enclosure were the 45ft x 22ft lifts, which could not be armoured because of the weight penalty that would be exacted, but movable armoured screens were provided at each end of the hangar, by the lift wells.
The armoured hangar concept proved its worth in the Far East where kamikazes caused damage above but not within it, thus not interfering significantly with aircraft operation; this contrasted sharply with US experience.

A three-shaft machinery arrangement was installed, as in Ark Royal, and to counter the weight of the island structure the hull was widened to port. The fixed battery consisted of eight powered 4.5in turrets, their crowns level with the flight deck and hence providing, theoretically, some measure of cross-deck fire. They were controlled by Mk IV directors. One hydraulic catapult (14,000lb capability) was fitted on the flight deck, forward and to port, and six wires aft formed the arresting system. Petrol stowage totalled 50,540 gallons.

Illustrious and Victorious were the two carriers provided under the 1936 Programme, the second pair under the 1937 Programme.
Indomitable’s design, however, was modified before she completed. Second thoughts were expressed about the size of the air group, and it was decided to revert to a two-level hangar arrangement, the lower one extending beneath the after half of the upper, 168ft long. The 16ft height was retained below, but the upper hangar was reduced to 14ft. The price for this increase in capacity was a reduction in the thickness of the hangar sides to 1 1/2in, but even so Indomitable’s displacement rose to 24,680 tons standard and 29,730 deep load. However, 48 aircraft could be accommodated. She received 8 x 20mm before completion, and complement stood at 1,592.

Modifications:

Wartime modifications were many and varied. The major structural change was a rebuilding of the flight deck forward and aft, giving an increased usable length of 740ft (745ft in Indomitable). The defensive battery was progressively augmented, first by the addition of 20mms and subsequently by installing 40mms in quadruple, twin and single mountings. By 1945, for example, Illustrious was showing more than fifty of the former and three Bofors AA guns , and Victorious, 45 x 20mm and 21 x 40mm.

The adoption of an aircraft deck park system (outriggers were fitted from the flight deck to support aircraft tailwheels) enabled the air group to be increased to 54 machines.
Radar was progressively updated, starting with Type 79 warning and moving through Types 281 (air warning) and 285 (4.5in gunnery) to Types 277 (height-finder) and 960 (air warning).
Arrester wires were strengthened and increased in number of cope with new, more demanding aircraft, for which reason some of the ships had their lifts stressed and enlarged. By 1945, complement had risen to about 2000, and a typical air group was 36 F4U Corsairs and 16 Avengers.

Service Notes

Victorious: Within a few days of commissioning, Victorious was involved in the battleship Bismarck chase, one of her Torpedo planes scoring a hit and slowing the German battleship.
Following escort and ferrying operations, she was engaged in strikes against Norway and cover for Arctic convoys to Russia which included an abortive attack on battleship Tirpitz. Further Malta convoys came in mid 1942, and the carrier was refitted at Norfolk Navy Yard during the winter of 1942-43, subsequently operating’ on loan’ to the US fleet in the Pacific before being relieved by Essex. A further attack was carried out on Tirpitz in the spring of 1944 while returned to the Home Fleet after a refit, but by July 1944 she was in the Far East, forming part of the British Pacific Fleet in 1945. She was hit by two kamikazes in May 1945, which necessitated repairs in Australia.
Of the war-built fleet-carriers, only Victorious was recommissioned into the Royal Navy and reconfigured 1950-1958 to operate jet aircraft. Finally, she was sold in July 1969 and broken up.

Users: British Royal Navy


Animated 3D model of for carrier Victorious of Illustrious class


Specifications for carrier Victorious of Illustrious class

Specifications
Victorious Specification
Type aircraft carrier
Displacement23,000 tons
Displacement (full loaded)28,210 tons
Length 673 ft
Beam 95 ft 9 in
Draught 24 ft
Boiler six Admirality 3-drum boilers
Propulsion Parsons geared turbines with 3 shafts
Power111,000 hp
Bunkerage4,850 tons petrol
Speed 30.5 kts
Range11,000 nm at 14 kts
Complement1,200 (later 1,500, 1945: 2,000)
Armament
Victorious Specification
Main Armament 16 x 4.5 in guns
Secondary Armament
Anti-Aircraft48 x 2pdr (later 56 x 40mm, 8 x 20mm; 1945: 21 x 40mm, 45 x 20mm)
Torpedo tubes
Anti-Submarine
Mines
Aircrafts36 (1945: 36 Corsairs + 16 Avengers = 52, maximum 54)
Armour Protection
Victorious thickness
Side (belt) 4 1/2 in
Flight deck3 in above hangar, 1 1/2 in – 1 in (deck ends)
Armoured aircraft hangar 4 1/2 in
Armour main deck 4 1/2 in
Armoured deck
Armour main turrets ?
Armour secondary turrets
Armour barbetts
Service statistics
Ships: Illustrious Formidable Victorious Indomitable
Laid downApril 27, 1937June 17, 1937May 4, 1937November 10, 1937
LaunchedApril 5, 1939August 17, 1939September 14, 1939March 26, 1940
CommissionedMay 25, 1940November 24, 1940May 15, 1941October 10, 1941
Price per unit? (US carrier Essex class with 30,800 tons approx. $ 68-78 millions)
Remainingthanks to armour, none lost in World War Two – all breaking up between 1953 and 1969.

MORE ABOUT:

Related Reports:
Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply